Search

The connection between the eternity and toxicity is not clear, the caption can elaborate on this to establish a direct link with toxcities.

Th artifact advances how natural or chemical weathering (toxicities) are fought with certain type of tombstones. Moreover, it shows a cycle of toxcities within a particular place, here, the chemical toxicities of the cemetary practices are dealt with the chemical resistant tombstone.

This visualization cleverly (and ironically) adresses the non-visualized and even the 'non-representational.' The ethnographer turns to an illustration by L.A. artist Stephanie Birdsong to draw our attention to an over-reliance on visuality when we are trying to understand and communicate taboo, toxicity, etc. While the illustration appears playful it vitalizes difficult questions about how we 'see' (or struggle to) our relationships to spaces of decomposition and death: How do we sensually navigate such spaces?

The caption is partly written. So, there is more detail to come. It would be interesting to reflect on how the ethnographer came across such illustration and how it moved them. I would also be fascinated to hear about any thoughts the ethnographer has about possible relationships between non-representational theory, visualization, and toxicity when undertaking such research. This visualization and hte caption has a lot of potential in that regard. 

The image is an illustration. I am assuming it is found, although a relationship with the illustrator may have been what prompted the use by the ethnographer. I am struck by how th eimgae iis somewhat whimsical in nature yet presents the opportunity for some challenging discussion about what is unseen, imagined, and unrepresentable in regards to toxicity. 

To be honest, I am not really sure how the image could be enriched. The caption/image could reference how this is a very western construction of death, decomposition, toxicity, etc. In so doing, it would could inspire others to seek to illustrate other particularly emplaced compositional examples that would challenge this interpretation. 

The image encourages us to reflect on the visualization of toxics by pushing us into an exploration of the unseen, yet in so doing reminds us of the power of the visual when it comes to our understanding toxics 

This visualization challenges us to think about the toxicity that is invisible, but simultaneously close in proximity to our everyday lives.

This is extremely interesting and it would be beneficial to elaborate on toxicity as it relates to cultural practices that produce this form of pollution. The author does note that the analysis is still under construction.

This is a found image created by an LA artist, Stephanie Birdsong.  I would be interested in knowing if the artist has a relation to the ethnographic project, or if the image was simply selected because it conveys the ethnographer's argument.