Search

I think this image serves the author's argument, but I'd much rather see the posters! Perhaps you could include a few of these along with the image? I'd love to get a glimps of the visual rhetoric being deployed in this discourse. I dont know if you took pictures of these posters, but I think putting a couple of the right ones together with this image and a good title could create a pretty cohesive visual argument.

This visualization (image and caption) is great for discussing how different forms of toxicity take effect at different scales and systems. The chemical toxins from fossil fuels are a threat to the geo level of the land, the bio level of human and nonhuman bodies, and the eco/atmo level of atmospheric systems. And yet, the fact that something as toxic as fossil fuels are still seen as valuable is due to the toxic ways in which our global economy has been planned at the macro level and practiced at the micro level.

This visualization questions the notion of eternity: can one lay claim to space for eternity, with inscriptions being legible for all time? What does this say about burial in this place specifically, wherein graves are expected to be preserved unlike in other places in the world? What does this say about both place and death in the U.S.? The quote by the green burial organization leader entails a certain skepticism regarding the manner in which grave spaces are managed. The visualization itself depicts a certain eeriness: the nameless buried entity.

Could use a bit more explanation about what the role of a green burial organization is, and why they have a stake in the gravestone market. In addition, a further explanation of how this place is toxic, and what the particular place is. What is the central argument here regarding place and toxicity? Finally, a bit more interpretation by the ethnographer would be useful for guiding the reader towards comprehending the image's significance and how it is tied to the caption. 

A marketing image (whose image specifically is unclear). The aesthetic is at once pristine/clean and haunting. Normally images of gravestones contain names, but in this instance there is no way to identify the space. The tomb appears as a symbol of death, and yet it's a symbol that is hardly questioned. But in this setting, the tomb becomes more questionable and significant. The image is very straight to the point and yet invokes a lot from its audience and their experiences with tombstones.

Perhaps a logo from the comapny marketing this image, or their own description of the tomb (the materiality of it), or a quote from their website/company that encourages people to purchase tombstones from them rather than anyone else. In addition, connecting the caption more to the image with an interpretation by the author could help extend the image's ethnographic import.

Not entirely sure, but perhaps questioning the manner in which the U.S. tends to value maintaining spaces for the dead via tombstones, and how this is in a sense toxic. Particularly in light of the fact that space is often a point of contention throughout the world. However, the nature of toxicity in this place may still need a bit more explanation. 

The toxicity is not apparent in the artifact, but it I think it refers to the hidden toxicities in the practices of maintianing the cemeteries through objectification of tombstones. Also, the toxicity is invisiblized through creation of fetish for chemically and physically resistant tombstones with the notions of memorialization and eternity.

If possible, the image can be replaced with the image of webpage of the advertising agency or the poster to directly connect the objectification and capitalization of the tombstones.

I think the image is extracted from the webpage of the private agency selling and promoting these tombstones. The image perfectly captures the solidifcation of the memory and eternity promoted by the agency.