Search

This image forces the viewer to asses themselves so as to ascertain whether or not they are "at risk of infection." It creates a general sense of being threatened. The faces have been cut out, which might make some more inclined to imagen themselves or their loved ones as one of the individuals being depicted. However, it is also likely quite othering for many viewers who are not cisgendered, heterosexual, white, and looking to conform to hegemonic conceptions of what constitutes "family."

The subject of this image is exclusion. It suggests that the primary reason to abstain from risky sexual behavior is to be able to conform to the norms of the white, middle class, american family.

This image does a good job of capturing the "limited scope" of the health organizations that created it. However, I think that the ethnographic aspects of this image could be elucidated to a higher degree by discussing particualr the context in which it was found in greater detail.

When first seeing this image I am one enranged/annoyed/frustrated. The violence against undocumented people and the racist policing mechanisms that incacerate them become invisible and are obscured as one views an image that could be a craiglist add for an apartment buidling. The toxicity becomes clear in the spatial removal of undocmented people from a metropole. The California desert becomes a mechanism for control and isolation. Additionally, as stated, the lack of bodies and context makes the images and the policing mechanisms in which these images represent seem rather benign.

The aseptic aspect of the facility in the pictures is what most calls my attention. This neatness stands at great odds with the dubious, illegal, conflicting, murky reality of migrant lives. It all seems accessible and, in many ways, even comfortable. Yet, the pictures purposefully leave outside any images that show this is a detention center. Cells are ironically called “east/west housing” -this is no housing; this is a place of abandonment.

By illustrating the literal and material waste that exist near the detention center, one is forced to conisder the environmental racisms that impact those who are incacerated. Additionally, the history of the site has layers of toxicity. Military presence in the high desert connotes a history of US imperialism, nuclear destruction, and the immediate bodily harm. Imperial ruination is thus happening both at the scale of the body and of the nation. This image also implies a history of city planning that traditionally puts hazardous waste close to those on the fringes of bare life.

"toxic fringes, removable subjects" "toxic fringes, removable subjects"My sense is that the image shows how, while land becomes toxic, instead of considering the removal of the underlying environmental problem, what is thought of as a solution is the incorporation of “removable subjects” or individuals seen “disposable” to this toxic area.

I would describe the subject as the invisble labor holding up the University of California education system. 

Inconsistency (with the UC's branded image and its lived reality)

I think it would be interesting to add imagry that signifies the wage gap in the UC system: perhaps by including an image of the Chancellor's home (or even numerical representations of his salary).