Search

This visualization challenges the usual senses provoked by photo essays and conservative journalism around nuclear disaster sites: that a belligerent nature has once again taken over abandoned ruins of toxic industrialism (such as this National Geographic essay about animals living in radiation ecosystem of Chernobyl), of "life" in post-capitalist (or in some cases, communist or socialist accumulative practices) ruins.

Since this visualization is countering hegemonic visualizations of nonhumans in Chernobyl, as the caption makes it clear, maybe juxtaposing or overlaying it with that hegemonic visualization could be interesting? I would also be interested in knowing more about how people who curate such more-than-human assemblies of vital life say about these hegemonic visualizations, if at all? 

This is a created image by the contributor. The little things in this image jump out at me, revealing practices of care and curation: the doll at the bottom, the hat on the dove (is it a military hat or some other type I cannot tell, but the intrigue works), the hanging yellow monkey toy (assuming it is a monkey at all). By calling attention away from nuclear clouds in the sky or haunting abandoned living and working spaces, the little things make more-than-human attachments evocative of memory, yes, but also of possible futures to come.