Search

This screenshot foregrounds the aesthetics of classificatory schema, the almost regimented sleek design quality makes me ponder the gulf between design and content. The PECE interface is sleek and well-organized, but the ease and minimalism of the design almost pronounce the distance we have from the toxic visualizations we are commenting on an thinking about. How can we perhaps in the cognitive and analytic process also include experiential interfaces that shape how we process and respond to toxic visualizations? This screenshot raises such questions for me. 

This screenshot foregrounds the aesthetics of classificatory schema, the almost regimented sleek design quality makes me ponder the gulf between design and content. The PECE interface is sleek and well-organized, but the ease and minimalism of the design almost pronounce the distance we have from the toxic visualizations we are commenting on an thinking about. How can we perhaps in the cognitive and analytic process also include experiential interfaces that shape how we process and respond to toxic visualizations? This screenshot raises such questions for me. 

I think it was fashioned like this because it is what most PECE users would identify with, vs using a screen shot of code.

Dimensions - spatial [frontend/backend], discursiveScale of analysis - local, mincro and mezzo.

Dimensions - spatial [frontend/backend], discursiveScale of analysis - local, micro and mezzo.

My vision stays focused on the white space.

The image works well with the description. How might it change if there was no description?

As a computer user.

Visceral - confusionEmotional - pleasingIntellectual - organized 

I understand this image as an ethnography of labor or workplace ethnography. The author is working on this digital platform through multiple points of entry.