As mentioned in the previous annotation, it might be nice to have more context as to the place: why is it there? Could the eerie 'non-native' sign be elaborated upon? Otherwise the caption is very thorough, and explains well the idea of anti-landscape.My only comment on the 'anti-landscape', however, is to think about landscape as something that doesn't necessarily need to be of use to humans. What kinds of things are able to use this landscape in our absence?
Artifact
Analytic (Question)
Everyone can view this content
On